In order to write new texts soon I translated some more short texts and here they are. So have fun in reading and please comment for critics or any other things you want to say...
The question is not if god exists but which ontological status he
has. God exists. But is he just one of the mightiest motives of thinking
and acting originated in the search for meaning in the world or is he
something that also exists outside of human mind?
One of the reasons why most people don't turn towards the big
problems to solve them, the global, the long range problems, the
cosmic as well as the ethical beyond the conventional is the
closeness of these big, global, noble, cosmic things to chaos. The
greater something is or seems the more it withdraws our individual
control and steals our illusion of security which is one of the most
fundamental needings of our species. But instead of confronting us
with this chaos in a constructive way, we rather prefer to frightfully
fall back into mother's womb, the warming embracement of society to
live happily ever after in the smallness of our illusions.
Contrary to the concervative's prophecy of doom the critical
thinking as core element of real education which leads to
deconstruction of assurances and the social created reality by
showing its contructional character does not drives us to chaos but
releases creative energy. This is an energy of evolvement and
creation of a different, an other and maybe a better world containing
more freedom. Critical thinking is the sworn enemy of every system of
every structure and it has to be to overcome the conservative
totalitarism of every socially built reality (Wirklichkeit). This is
one of the most fundamental dialectics of the evolution of systems.
The one-sided and generalized assignment of guilt, in the end
nothing more than a scapegoat strategy to transfer your own
inferiority complex, helplessness, desperation and anger to ''the
jews'', ''the muslem'', ''the left-side intellectuals'' or whatever
construction you prefer, shows a dubble edged problematic as its
core. This is on one side the striking lack of real education as
ciritical, self and world reflecting thinking and on the other side
the marginal attention to this lack of education. This unfolds from
the general marginalisation of the humanities and social sciences
which in the first place have the potential for this type of
education but are always critical to the system. The helplessness of the
politics just comes form this dilemma. The system needs this
marginalisation of critical thinking to be able to exist but
therefore is impotent to cure the grounds of these mind desease. What
remains is either violently acting against it or the hope that this
ends without doing anything. But the latter does not cure the
desease, it just may reduces the destructive fire to a little flame
of dissatisfaction, smoldering hatred and lacking of education which
only needs a little gas again to rise again.
I believe in it, yes, i totally do. I decided to believe that it
is out there, this reality. But this is all I can and nothing
distinguishes me in this case form other believers. I am able to
believe but nothing more. The reality and all our worlds we create
out of this gloomy shine we believe can ''see'' are nothing more than
doctrines. I am not able to ever experience reality as what she might
''really'' be. All I have are just the multiple realities we
construct on ourselves...
(from: constructivistic relfections of a life)
Even the so called ''natural sciences'' are not able to represent
reality on its own but tell us realities which they help to
construct. Representing reality would mean to have the ability to
experience it outside of perception because every perception no
matter through which ''glasses'' you ''see'' or by which instruments
is an act of interpreting the world as a world depending on
pre-existing and previous realities already built and adopted.
Because perception is always a part of representing or experiencing
''the'' world the natural science also only offer us constructed
realities equipped with meaning build to narratives. Only if we also
finally brake down the believe in the truth of the natural sciencesin
general we have a chance to upvalue the social science and humanities
which seem to be advanced in relfecting themselves. What comes out of
this don't have to be uncertainty but a science who is able to think
the possible outside her hitherto narratives. Also there is no chaos
because of this but the possibility of creation in times we can not
refer to ''naturalness'' for creating specific social realities and
fight with swords in hands against everything different.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen